ConcurrencyRecipes

Practical solutions to problems with Swift Concurrency

1172
39
Swift

ConcurrencyRecipes

Practical solutions to problems with Swift Concurrency

Swift Concurrency can be really hard to use. I thought it could be handy to document and share solutions and hazards you might face along the way. I am absolutely not saying this is comprehensive, or that the solutions presented are great. I’m learning too. Contributions are very welcome, especially for problems!

Table of Contents

Hazards

Quick definitions for the hazards referenced throughout the recipes:

  • Timing: More than one option is available, but can affect when events actually occur.
  • Ordering: Unstructured tasks means ordering is up to the caller. Think carefully about dependencies, multiple invocations, and cancellation.
  • Lack of Caller Control: definitions always control actor context. This is different from other threading models, and you cannot alter definitions you do not control.
  • Sendability: types that cross isolation domains must be sendable. This isn’t always easy, and for types you do not control, not possible.
  • Blocking: Swift concurrency uses a fixed-size thread pool. Tying up background threads can lead to lag and even deadlock.
  • Availability: Concurrency is evolving rapidly, and some APIs require the latest SDK.
  • Async virality: Making a function async affects all its callsites. This can result in a large number of changes, each of which could, itself, affect subsequence callsites.
  • Actor Reentrancy: More than one thread can enter an Actor’s async methods. An actor’s state can change across awaits.

Contributing and Collaboration

I’d love to hear from you! Get in touch via mastodon, an issue, or a pull request.

I prefer collaboration, and would love to find ways to work together if you have a similar project.

By participating in this project you agree to abide by the Contributor Code of Conduct.